One such test, called atomic force microscopy AFM , uses a hair-thin needle mounted on a small springboardlike lever to measure the atomic forces between the needle and a sample.
A laser reflects off the top of the lever, which is able to measure the amount of deflection, up or down, that the needle experiences in its interaction with the surface.
The readout gives the thickness measured, and because graphite flakes stack at a constant distance from one another, you can do the math to determine the number of layers. In effect, it creates a height map of a surface. It all might be made possible by the most abundant, most versatile, and most essential of all elements, carbon. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy are methods of looking at what a flake of graphene looks like, but on a much finer level than optical microscopy is capable of.
These two analyses have a much higher magnification resolution and are therefore able to find rips, tears, and other punctures in a flake; such punctures may be naturally existing or may have formed during the graphene's isolation or handling.
XPS determines the chemical makeup of a sample nondestructively, and so would give you all of the information that CNHS provides while still allowing you to recover your sample. In this technique, X-rays are fired at the graphene surface, and some of the X-rays are absorbed by electrons in the sample.
The electrons are ejected from the sample with an energy characteristic of the element in the sample, which tells you what elements are present and in what amounts. Other than the Scotch tape method and chemical exfoliation, what could our options be for making graphene in large amounts? Is there any way that we might print or grow something into graphene? Mechanical exfoliation may be used to peel hunks of graphite from the surface of a larger graphite hunk, with successive peelings carried out to isolate a few monolayer sheets.
This process has been dramatically improved over the years, and indeed, special tapes are now used, which can dissolve in water or other solvents more easily than can office tape. That makes depositing graphene flakes even easier than before. The second method, chemical exfoliation, has a history going back to the late s. As with the mechanical exfoliation process, researchers have added to the field by developing new exfoliation parameters. Generally they are less harsh on the graphite and so minimize damage to the graphene surfaces.
Perhaps the method uses recyclable materials, which would be tremendously important for any company that wants to produce literally tons of graphene per year. Some of the improvements improve the yield of pristine monolayer flakes, which is the most important optimization of all. Graphene can also be grown from silicon carbide to produce what is called epitaxial graphene.
Graphene layer growth from the decomposition of silicon carbide is now an extremely complicated process, in which the silicon is sublimed at high temperature but the atmosphere above the surface layer is variable. Tailoring the environment above the surface allows researchers to produce graphene at better efficiencies than with an open-air atmosphere. A Nature Materials editorial by Peter Sutter described an advance in epitaxial growth that involved removing air from above the silicon carbide surface and replacing it with an inert noble gas atmosphere.
Since then, research has turned back toward reactive atmospheres. Controlled confinement sublimation CCS is a way to produce graphene on a silicon carbide substrate. If the silicon is not confined, the graphene grows in a rapid and uncontrolled manner A. Under confinement in a graphite enclosure, sublimated silicon allows graphene to grow at near-thermodynamic equilibrium B ; heat is supplied by an induction furnace C. This method produces one to ten layers of graphene on the silicon-terminated face and up to layers on the carbon-terminated face D—F.
In a twist, three groups from across Germany devised a method in which they glued a plastic made from many aromatic benzene hexagons onto a silicon carbide surface and found that this plastic actually drastically improved the size and quality of graphene monolayers produced from the silicon sublimation.
This work was inspired by an earlier paper, which fused CVD with epitaxial growth to improve the graphene yield. It seems that somehow the combination of these two processes creates a product that is leagues better than either isolated method. That could spell disaster for graphite mining companies that are betting their futures on selling to graphene consumers. This will be a development to keep close tabs on.
Therefore, it is absolutely imperative to find a way that graphene can be made reliably from a cheap or free resource. If graphene could be made from things that would otherwise go to waste, this would significantly decrease the long-term price of graphene so that anyone could have access to it. Ammonia came out of the reaction, ready to be put into fertilizer. What starting material could we use for carbon as a feedstock that would not unduly tax typical sources of carbon, such as fossil fuels or natural gas?
Certainly, one option is to harvest carbon dioxide from the air and reduce it back to C. That is an extremely energy-intensive process, however, and no technological advances within the known laws of physics will reduce that energy demand. If graphene could be made from things that would otherwise go to waste, this would significantly decrease the long-term price of graphene. That leads us back to thinking about something that is abundant, all around us, makes efficient use of capturing carbon, and can capture this carbon without direct energy input from humans: plants.
Plants take in passive solar light and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and grow in most places of their own accord. Huge trees are carbon sinks made possible by photosynthesis. Lots of plant waste is generated per year, which might go toward creating graphene if it would otherwise take up space within a landfill.
Invasive species of plants, such as kudzu and bamboo in the southeastern United States, can serve as a feedstock. James Tour took this to a logical extreme in on a bet. Tour had been thinking about the ways to use the carbon already free around us in the environment. He had been successful in converting Plexiglas polymethylmethacrylate to graphene, and table sugar was his next target. After having turned table sugar into pyrolysis-CVD graphene flakes on a piece of copper foil, one of his colleagues perked up, and dared Tour to make graphene out of six different carbon-based materials: cookies, chocolate, grass, polystyrene Styrofoam , roaches, and dog feces.
This result is interesting, as the Australian laboratory mentioned above failed when using a copper foil substrate for their soybean oil conversion process. What these conflicting stories mean, however, is that there is vast room for improvement in our understanding of the way graphene forms from gaseous molecules. Using the same method employed with the table sugar, all of the proposed unusual carbon sources produced small flakes of high-quality graphene.
Tour and his coworkers stressed that no preparation or purification of these weird materials was necessary. In other words, a roach leg could be dropped on the foil, heated up, and come out as graphene.
Along with Marco de Fazio, a scientist from STMicrolectronics, a firm that manufactures ink-jet print heads, they were clustered around a small, half-built device that looked a little like a Tinkertoy contraption on a mirrored base.
We need to add all the electronics. They might mix the material into plastic or simply print it onto the surface of existing objects.
There were still formidable hurdles. The researchers had figured out how to turn graphene into a liquid—no easy task, since the material is severely hydrophobic, which means that it clumps up and clogs the print heads.
They needed to first convert graphene to graphene oxide, adding groups of oxygen and hydrogen molecules, but this process negates its electrical properties. So once they printed the object they would have to heat it with a laser. When that might be possible was uncertain; she hoped to have the device working in three months. De Fazio suggested that they cover it with a silicon wafer. Palacios recognizes that millennial change comes only after modest, strategic increments.
He mentioned Samsung, which, according to industry rumor, is planning to launch the first device with a screen that employs graphene. These things will be able to connect to your phone or to the embedded displays everywhere, to tell you about things happening around you. For the moment, the challenges are more earthbound: scientists are still trying to devise a cost-effective way to produce graphene at scale.
They then use acids to etch away the copper. The resulting graphene is invisible to the naked eye and too fragile to touch with anything but instruments designed for microelectronics.
The process is slow, exacting, and too expensive for all but the largest companies to afford. The paper was later approved for publication. Peng had stumbled on his method a few months before. While heating graphene oxide with a laser, he missed the sample, and accidentally heated the material it was sitting on, a sheet of polyimide plastic. Where the laser touched the plastic, it left a black residue. He showed me how it worked, the laser tracking back and forth across the surface of a piece of polyimide and leaving with each pass a needle-thin deposit of material.
Single layers of graphene absorb 2. After a few minutes, Peng had produced a crisp, matte-black lattice—perhaps an inch wide, and worth tens of thousands of dollars. The tech-research firm Gartner uses an analytic tool that it calls the Hype Cycle to help investors determine which discoveries will make money. Nearly every scientist I spoke with suggested that graphene lends itself especially well to hype. Guha, at I. In order to develop a technology, there is a lot of discipline that needs to go in, a lot of things that need to be done that are perhaps not as sexy.
Tour concurs, and admits to some complicity. A few years ago, we were building molecular electronic devices. I just felt so excited about it. The impulse to overlook obvious difficulties to commercial development is endemic to scientific research. People just closed their eyes. According to Friedel, the historian, scientists rely on the stubborn conviction that an obvious obstacle can be overcome. But not always. A couple of bicycle mechanics could come along and prove us wrong.
An additive to fluids used in oil drilling, developed with a subsidiary of the resource company Schlumberger, promised to make drilling more efficient and to leave less waste in the ground; instead, barrels of the stuff decomposed before they could be used. It has been before our eyes all this time! The raw graphene is then loaded onto a silicon chip, before being subjected to a blast of gold pellets and plasma.
Because a sheet of graphene is only as thick as a single atom, the material can't be seen by the human eye. However, nearly everyone has produced the remarkable substance in the course of ordinary life. Graphite is the main component in pencil "lead," and lightly drawn pencil lines are able to produce small amounts of graphene. Although scientists knew one atom thick, two-dimensional crystal graphene existed, no-one had worked out how to extract it from graphite," the University of Manchester reports on their website.
It was at that university in England where, in , a pair of researchers finally found a way to reliably produce the substance. These range from electronics to consumer gadgets, to medicine and biomechanics. A popular application is in electronics. And, of course, bendable screens. Combined with silly-putty, graphene was used as a heart monitor. Its biocompatibility has made graphene a safe material for brain electrodes.
Also, a graphene elastomer could revolutionize robotics and prosthetics. The list goes on.
0コメント